Neurons Different in Left, Right Brain Structure
September 15, 2000 WASHINGTON, Sept. 15 (UPI) -- Scientists in Germany have found that two
structures in the brain-one left, one right-may look the same to the naked eye,
but their individual neurons appear pronouncedly different under the microscope.
The finding could be the first step toward unraveling the cellular "wiring" of
different parts of the brain, and might ultimately help doctors determine what
goes wrong in conditions such as autism and Alzheimer's disease, said neurology
experts.
According to Michael Gazzaniga, professor of cognitive neuroscience at Dartmouth
University, Hanover, New Hampshire, the painstaking discovery is the first
evidence of cellular differences between corresponding structures on the right
and left sides of the brain that appear identical anatomically but behave
differently.
The key is likely their difference in function. The brain structure, called
Brodmann's area 22, is critical for generating and understanding individual
words on the left side. On the right, however, it helps discriminate between
melody, pitch, and sound intensity, he explained.
Gazzaniga wrote an editorial about the study, which appears in the current issue
of the journal Science.
To conduct their study, lead author Ralf A. W. Galuske and his colleagues at the
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research in Frankfurt examined the brains of six
men and one woman, ranging in age from 34 to 82, who had died 18 to 24 hours
before.
From each brain they took tissue samples from a region known as Brodmann's area
22 from both the right and left sides of the brain. Then they injected each
sample with a special dye that revealed the interconnections among the neurons
in those areas.
The neuron clusters comprising each area were similar in size, Galuske and
co-workers found. What varied were the distances between the clusters: on the
left, they were about 20 percent farther apart, with more fiber connections
among the cells and a more complex cellular architecture.
"These interconnections suggest an underlying difference as to why that part of
the brain is active in processing language," Gazzaniga told United Press
International. "This is a quantum jump forward-it's really going to push
research along fast."
"This study clearly demonstrates that an area associated with speech processing
differs from the same area on the other side of the brain," added Jeffrey
Hutsler, assistant professor of psychology at the University of Michigan, Ann
Arbor.
Hutsler called the study "heroic" because the investigators had to allow four to
six months for the dye to stain the brain specimens completely, with no
guarantee of obtaining significant results.
In children who have had their left hemispheres removed because of injuries or
to treat diseases such as epilepsy, "the right hemisphere steps up to the bat"
to compensate for language ability, Hutsler explained. However, these patients
have lingering deficits in their ability to understand complex sentences.
"From a clinical standpoint, this study shows that there may be some
critical organizational areas that help people achieve complete
functionality, which might have implications for people who have lost some of
these language areas." One question that remains is, "how much of language
ability is built in, and how much is the result of interaction with the
environment?"
Various scanning techniques have already shown that when appreciating speech,
for example, nerve cells in the left brain fire harder, said pharmacologist
Desmond Smith of the University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine.
"But these imaging techniques don't show what is happening at the level of the
nerve cell," he said. "This paper provides a very careful microscopic evaluation
of the same part of the brain in the right and left hemispheres."
Studying differences in gene expression throughout the brain will add to the
light shed on the microscopic differences in anatomy associated with various
functions and could eventually help doctors understand what goes wrong in
certain diseases, Gazzaniga said.
He explained: "If we begin to learn the normal wiring patterns of the human
brain and combine that with gene expression, then you can start tackling
diseases and ask what's wrong with these brains."
(Reported by Norra MacReady in Los Angeles.)
United Press International
(C) 2000 UPI All Rights Reserved.